![la navaja de ockham la navaja de ockham](https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1200/1*PhtdV01hIHLtmQq-4xaiYw.gif)
You see that I have set out opposing assertions in response to your question and I have touched on quite strong arguments in support of each position.
![la navaja de ockham la navaja de ockham](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/71/f1/ea/71f1ea8a93c5ac6132da0bdb104ea3ad.jpg)
To decide by way of teaching, therefore, which assertion should be considered catholic, which heretical, chiefly pertains to theologians, the experts on divine scripture. And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take his part out of the book of life and out of the holy city, and from these things that are written in this book." We clearly gather from all these that nothing should be added to sacred scripture nor anything removed from it. Other later scientists stated similar simplifying laws and principles.Contexto: The Holy Spirit through blessed John the evangelist makes a terrible threat against those who add anything to or take anything from divine scripture when he says in the last chapter of Revelations, "If any man shall add to these things, God shall add unto him the plagues which are in this book. Likewise, in science, Nicole d’Oresme, a 14th-century French physicist, invoked the law of economy, as did Galileo later, in defending the simplest hypothesis of the heavens. The principle was, in fact, invoked before Ockham by Durandus of Saint-Pourçain, a French Dominican theologian and philosopher of dubious orthodoxy, who used it to explain that abstraction is the apprehension of some real entity, such as an Aristotelian cognitive species, an active intellect, or a disposition, all of which he spurned as unnecessary. The principle is also expressed as “Entities are not to be multiplied beyond necessity.” Occam’s razor, also spelled Ockham’s razor, also called law of economy or law of parsimony, principle stated by the Scholastic philosopher William of Ockham (1285–1347/49) that pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate, “plurality should not be posited without necessity.” The principle gives precedence to simplicity: of two competing theories, the simpler explanation of an entity is to be preferred. They cite as an example the competing theories of creationism and evolution, in which relative “simplicity” depends on temporal and cultural context. Critics of the principle argue that it prioritizes simplicity over accuracy and that, since one cannot absolutely define “simplicity,” it cannot serve as a sure basis of comparison.
![la navaja de ockham la navaja de ockham](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/QFCL0IowoVQ/maxresdefault.jpg)
The validity of Occam’s razor has long been debated. SpaceNext50 Britannica presents SpaceNext50, From the race to the Moon to space stewardship, we explore a wide range of subjects that feed our curiosity about space!.Learn about the major environmental problems facing our planet and what can be done about them! Saving Earth Britannica Presents Earth’s To-Do List for the 21st Century.Britannica Beyond We’ve created a new place where questions are at the center of learning.100 Women Britannica celebrates the centennial of the Nineteenth Amendment, highlighting suffragists and history-making politicians.
LA NAVAJA DE OCKHAM HOW TO
COVID-19 Portal While this global health crisis continues to evolve, it can be useful to look to past pandemics to better understand how to respond today.Student Portal Britannica is the ultimate student resource for key school subjects like history, government, literature, and more.From tech to household and wellness products. This Time in History In these videos, find out what happened this month (or any month!) in history.#WTFact Videos In #WTFact Britannica shares some of the most bizarre facts we can find.Demystified Videos In Demystified, Britannica has all the answers to your burning questions.
![la navaja de ockham la navaja de ockham](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/iBpznbOP_Jk/maxresdefault.jpg)